Check Understanding In invalidating preclearance provisions, what larger point was the Supreme Court making about voting rights?

Question

gold2009 gold2009

07-03-2018
History

contestada

Check Understanding In invalidating preclearance provisions, what larger point was the Supreme Court making about voting rights?

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Tu ______ en espanol A) pensais B) piensa C) pienso D) piensas

Leadership is the ability to ______ employees to voluntarily pursue organizational goals.

Turning the palm of the hand backward (down) is called:

what is the average on her next 3 rounds to bring her avg down to 92 strokes?

place these events in the order which they occurred the revolutions of 1989

this equation please help

How many cells will be produced after one cell goes through two turns of the cell cycle

Ariel has two children, christopher and pat. christopher is 25 years old and pat is 22. both are full time students at southern college, have full tuition sch

If -34=-34 how many solutions does it have ??

Employees who are having computer problems at travelworld go to amy rather than the it department because she is efficient and considerate about helping out and

MrZieleniewo MrZieleniewo · Answer 1 · 2018-03-17T14:12:13+01:00

The Supreme Court was affirming the point that states (not the federal government) should be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.

The Supreme Court decision you're referring to, which invalidated pre-clearance conditions, was Shelby County v. Holder (2013). "Pre-clearance" meant that certain states, according to the Voting Rights Acts of 1965, had to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting. That standard had been applied to several states because they had displayed discriminatory practice in their voting laws. The decision in Shelby County v. Holder held that the federal government could not keep applying that requirement on the basis of decades-old data.

I recently posted another answer on Shelby County v. Holder, which you can check out too. Read more on Brainly.com - https://brainly.com/question/9069264#readmore

Tundexi Tundexi · Answer 2 · 2022-03-18T13:52:31+01:00

The larger point made by Supreme Court about the voting right the federal government should not be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.

What is a voting right?

The Voting Rights Act refers to a legislation that prohibit the discriminatory voting practices that was adopted in many southern states after the Civil War.

The Supreme Court decision was about decision in Shelby County v. Holder (2013) which states one have to get approval in advance from federal authorities for any changes they made to their state regulations regarding voting.

In conclusion, the point made by Supreme Court about the voting right the federal government should not be in charge of the voting procedures in their states.