Review the evidence.

For example, the bookmobile will stop running at the end of this summer. "I'm sad to see the bookmobile go," said Ms. Tomlinson, "because it brings the library to people who ﬁnd it hard to come to us."

Which best analyzes the quality of the evidence's support for the claim that the funding of the public library should be protected because the library offers important programs and services that benefit the whole community?

A.) The quality is poor; the evidence only explains one program when the author is claiming that many more will be cut.

B.) The quality is okay; it could be improved by explaining why this program, instead of others, will be cut.

C.) The quality is good; it shows that a specific service that will be cut and explains the population that will be most affected by this cut.

D.) The quality is okay; it mentions a specific service that will be cut, but it could be improved by explaining how this service is related to the library.

The claim of the text states mentions that the funding will impact "important programs and services". The claim uses the plural form of program and also service to indicate that there is more than one of each of these to be affected by the cuts in funding. This makes the evidence quality poor. Only one program is mentioned so it doesn't address the entire claim.