contestada

Think about what you have learned about union activities in the 1800s. How did strikes hurt unions' goals? List at least two arguments in opposition to the use of strikes.

Respuesta :

strangerthings

Strikes often grew violent.


Striking workers often lost their jobs.


Strikes were often opposed by the public.


Striking workers could be injured or killed.


Strikes did not always work.


ogorwyne

Strikes hurt union goals by:

  • leading to acts of violence
  • By leading to job losses

Strikes are one of the tools that trade unions in the 1800s used to get their needs met and their voice heard. But sometimes, these strikes could be counter productive.

Some of the disadvantages of these strikes were:

Leads to acts of violence:

Sometimes these trade union strikes start off peacefully in the form of peaceful protests. But a few elements could do something that might lead to violence and destruction. When this happens properties and lives are destroyed.

By leading to job losses:

Some employers may decide to give out the jobs of those that are on strike. By the time the strike is over their position has been filled by someone else.

read more on https://brainly.com/question/2924493

Otras preguntas