in Katz v united states, the supreme court ruled that tapping a public phone without warrant violated the defendant’s:

a: freedom of assembly
b: protection against unreasonable search and seizure
c: protection against double jeopardy
d: right to avoid self-incrimination

Protection against unreasonable search and seizure make it illlegal for the law enforcment to conduct a search in citizens' property without having proper warrant. The court ruled out that public phone is technically citizens' property since it's being maintained using citizen's tax money.

Answer Link

in Katz v united states, the supreme court ruled that tapping a public phone without warrant violated the defendant’s: a: freedom of assembly b: protection against unreasonable search and seizure c: protection against double jeopardy d: right to avoid self-incrimination

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

in Katz v united states, the supreme court ruled that tapping a public phone without warrant violated the defendant’s:

a: freedom of assembly
b: protection against unreasonable search and seizure
c: protection against double jeopardy
d: right to avoid self-incrimination