NO, they are not the same. The fittest individual is not necessarily the strongest, fastest, or biggest. Fitness also applies to the ability to find a mate and produce offspring. Survival is the form that an individual will leave the most copies of itself in the subsequent generations. Fitness does not include a measure of survival or lifespan. Fitness is measured by an organism's ability to survive and reproduce, which determines the size of its genetic contribution to the next generation.
No, fitness, as used in biology and survival, does not have the same meaning.
The continuous existence of organisms that are best adapted to their native environment along with the other organisms.
In biology, relative fitness deals with both relative survival and relative reproduction. While survival is the existence of organisms in a particular environment where they produce viable offspring which carry their traits for the future.
Therefore, fitness, as used in biology and survival, does not have the same meaning.
To learn more about Survival and fitness, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/10585955
