Respuesta :
Answer:
I have to be brief, but you can write around it if you choose. So, WWII leaves 100 million+ dead in the USSR, many were by purges demanded by Stalin;
What, another 80 million in Europe? A Far Eastern bloodbath of Japan who’s armies marched through and killed who knows how many in the Philippines and China to Burma? North Africa a complete mess? And a relatively small number of a people Who had no homeland, simply wanted to go to their ancestral home. What would of been the genius argument? Oh, uh, someone might get HURT? The World was awash in Blood. Britain, still a colonial power and in control of an absolute sliver of land; when I drive into town from home, it is surprising how close it is to the dimensions of that land... I can see problems in it; the British and French had no right to chop up the Middle East and Turkish empires in such a way After WWI - it would MAKE trouble, as we have seen; but try very hard to see into the past, the carnage the death - The Death Camps, and it seems very hard to fault these people a tiny slice of their Historical background for a new Homeland.
Where else would they go? Scatter them to the winds again? I think it did make sense under the circumstances. If Europe had burned most of my family, I’d want out as well, and why not return to the land of my Ancestors?
Explanation:
I hope that is at least helpful as a start. Just calm it down a little. Maybe.