Marnie works at a supermarket. Marnie notices that children in the supermarket often misbehave while shopping with a caregiver, and she decides to conduct an experiment to determine whether supermarket personnel can do anything to discourage the behavior. She recruits friends to serve as data collectors but makes a point not to share her hypothesis with them. One Friday from 12:00 P.M. to 2:00 P.M., one of her research team members offers a small piece of candy to every fifth child who comes through the door with a caregiver. The child must be small enough to be placed in a shopping cart. Another team member follows and monitors the child for the occurrence of misbehaving (operationally defined as instances of screaming, loud crying, or grabbing inappropriately at merchandise or people). On the following Sunday from 12:00 P.M. to 2:00 P.M. Marnie dispatches a research team member to follow every fifth child in the targeted age range (young enough to fit in a shopping cart), but they were not to offer candy or intervene in any way. She will compare the degree to which children act out and disturb other shoppers in the two conditions. Her belief is that by distracting the child with sugar, the child will act out less. When she tallies the number of misbehaviors, she is surprised to discover that the children who received candy actually had more instances of misbehavior than those who did not.

RESULTS OF THE CANDY CONDITION

Child 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Number of Misbehaviors 3 2 3 8 3 4 4 3 1 0
RESULTS OF THE NO-CANDY CONDITION

Child 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Number of Misbehaviors 0 0 1 1 4 2 2 0 1 1

Identify the independent variable.
Describe Marnie’s strategy for subject assignment.
Describe one extraneous variable and how Marnie controlled for this particular variable.
Describe one ethical challenge in the execution of Marnie’s project.
Identify the mode in the candy condition.
Calculate the range in the no-candy condition.
Explain how authoritative parenting styles could affect children's behavior in the supermarket.

3. An extraneous variable would be the time of day she observes their behavior (young children might be fussier depending on what time it is), but she controls this by studying kids behavior from 12-2 each time.

4. One ethical challenge could be that she didn't ask for the consent of the child or parent if they could be watched and studied for the experiment.

5. The mode of the candy condition is 3 misbehaviors, it's the amount that occurs most frequently.

6. The range in the no-candy condition is 4. You take the highest amount of misbehaviors and subtract the lowest amount (4-0=0).

7. Authoritative parenting could help improve a child's behavior in the store because they have expectations and enforced rules on how their child should act in a public setting, but will also listen to their kids reasoning if they want to buy something like dessert.

Cricetus Cricetus · Answer 2 · 2021-11-11T19:25:49+01:00

According to the theory, we can say that candy would be an independent variable. A further explanation is below.

Marnie assigned subjects using a sophisticated representative sample or selection.
One ethical dilemma with this investigation would be that no expressed permission was obtained from either of the subjects.
The time of collecting information becomes a superfluous variable. Marnie adjusted for this variable by gathering information for something like the test run group between 12:00 PM until 2:00 PM.

As a result, the aforementioned response is correct.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/19489944