The statement “force equals mass times acceleration (F=ma)” is Newton’s second law of motion. Why is this a law rather than a theory?
A-It states, rather than explains, the relationship between the variables.

B- .It cannot be proven, whereas a theory can be proven.

C-.It may be revised if new information shows that the relationship has changed.

D- It was classified as a law because it is related to other similar discoveries.

Newton’s second law of motion is a law rather than a theory because: A. It states, rather than explains, the relationship between the variables.

Newton's Second Law of Motion states that the acceleration of a physical object is directly proportional to the net force acting on the physical object and inversely proportional to its mass.

Mathematically, it is given by the formula;

[tex]Force = mass[/tex] × [tex]acceleration[/tex]

This ultimately implies that, Newton's Second Law of Motion is a law because rather than explain, it states the relationship between the three (3) variables;

Force.

Acceleration.

Mass.

In conclusion, a law can be proven whereas a theory may be revised in the event that a new information shows that there is a change in relationship between the variables.

Read more here: https://brainly.com/question/24029674