Respuesta :
Answer:
A.) Is it relevant to the subject or event?
C.)Does it contain information that is outdated?
E.)Does it explain a version of how the even occurred?
Explanation:
leat me know in the comments if I’m wrong please :)
When checking whether a source is credible, the questions that a historian should ask are:
- Is it relevant to the subject or event?
- Is the author an expert on the subject or event?
- Does it explain a version of how the event occurred?
In order to find out if a source is giving credible information, a historian needs to find out if the information given is related to the event in question. Only those that are related can be considered credible.
Historian also needs to find out if the author is an expert who is well versed in the field because that would increase the chances of the source being credible.
Finally the historian needs to make sure the source simply explains a version of the event from a biased perspective as this would make it less credible.
In conclusion, the historian needs to ask several questions before accepting a source as credible.
Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/21285073 and https://brainly.com/question/837108.