Read this sentence from "Rules of the Game."
Soon I no longer lost any games or Life Savers, but I lost my adversaries.
Which statement best explains how the action in this sentence provokes the speaker's decision to begin playing chess with Lau Po?
O Her brothers take all her Life Savers, so she wants to win money to buy more
O She wants to prove that girls can be better chess players than boys.
O She wants to learn more about chess so she can finally beat her brothers.
O Her brothers will not play chess with her anymore, so she needs a new opponent

The statement that most adequately elaborates the way in which the action in the sentence induces the decision of the speaker to start playing chess along with Lau Po would be:

D). Her brothers will not play chess with her anymore, so she needs a new opponent.

As per the question, the last statement asserts that 'her brothers would not be able to play with her further and she requires a new rival who could play against her' functions to elaborate the reason that led the speaker to play against Lau Po.
This statement explains that because her brothers could not play, led her to find someone who could play with her.
This is the cause that instigates the action from the speaker and she made the decision to play against Lau Po whom she does not like at all.

Thus, option D is the correct answer.

Learn more about 'sentence' here:

brainly.com/question/696177