Next, the defense lawyer presents his case. He argues that Mark has turned his life around since his earlier arrest. The night of the theft, Mark was studying. He is a high school dropout who wants to take the equivalency exam, so he can go to college. Mark was spotted by the police while walking home from the local library. The lawyer also argues that there is no solid evidence against his client. The footage of the theft is unclear, and many people come and go in the area where the bike was stolen. Also, there are two sets of fingerprints on the bike. One set belongs to Lee Ling. But the other set does not match Mark Greene's prints.

What argument does the defense lawyer make?

The defendant has a strong alibi for the time of the crime.
The defendant was nowhere near the scene of the crime.
The prosecutor should not have included the defendant's criminal record.
The prosecutor did not present strong evidence against the defendant.