Respuesta :
The given statement is true, that is any valid theory of defense that is supported by the evidence at trial is entitled to have the jury instructed on the law that applies.
The evidence presented to the jury in court should be the basis for their decision. Based on their assessment of the evidence and what the judge instructs them regarding the law, they determine what has been proven and what has not, and they render a verdict on each count. A defendant must be found guilty if the jury is unanimous in its conviction. The highly dramatic phrase "beyond a reasonable doubt" may have been used. However, we now only inquire as to the jurors' level of certainty rather than saying that. The jury must acquit if they aren't certain of the defendant's guilt. The judge must determine if information is pertinent and whether it is appropriate for the jury to be informed of it.
The judge must determine if information is pertinent and whether it is appropriate for the jury to be informed of it. He might determine that it is irrelevant and out-of-date evidence that is just being used to malign the husband's reputation and sway the jury against him. In that case, he would disregard the proof.
To learn more about evidence please click on the given link: https://brainly.com/question/344776
#SPJ4
