The court may rule that parol evidence might be admissible to further the court's understanding of an agreement when a court determines that a written agreement does not represent a complete and final version of the agreement.
Parol evidence rule is a matter of substantive law, evidence admitted in violation of the rule, even though without objection, should be disregarded if the objection is made before case is submitted to the trier of facts. If the parol evidence rule applies at all in a given situation, it has the effect of preventing one party from introducing into court extrinsic (or collateral) evidence of matters not contained in the written agreement between the parties, where that evidence is offered to supplement or contradict the written agreement.
Learn more about the Parol evidence rule here:
https://brainly.com/question/29566079
#SPJ4
