What do you think is the difference between being imaginative in doing science and Doing pseudoscience?

Question

06-10-2015
Physics

contestada

What do you think is the difference between being imaginative in doing science and Doing pseudoscience?

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

A net force of 10.N accelerates an object at 5.0 m/s^2. What net force would be required to accelerate the same object at 1.0 m/s^2? A.) 1.0 N B.) 5.0 N C.) 50

to calculatw the power produced by a force, the size of the force must be known. What else needs to be known to calculate the power

It takes 2.150 in3 of mercury to make one manometer. Find the price of the mercury used to make 17 manometers by first calculating the cost of mercury for one m

Can i have some good feed back on the story i am writing for my English Class...? You will be super helpful..!!! Here a few parts of my story not the full thing

Correctly add a comma to each of the following sentences: 1. The belligerent dog barked loudly but I was not frightened. 2. Abby and David skateboarded on the a

In what region of the ocean would you expect to find submarine canyons? A. Abyssal plain B. Continental rise C. Continental shelf D. Submarine trench

Diagnostic Test study island

Is this sentence grammatically correct? a. She motions to the clouds.

the sum of 5 percent of a number and 9 is 16

WorldCitizen WorldCitizen · Answer 1 · 2015-10-20T23:08:02+02:00

I would say that being imaginative in science means finding new ways to find or analyse the data, but which do not make the data false or which do not manipulate the data. Being imaginative in science should not cross the boundary of making the science not reliable

Being imaginative in pseudoscience could mean manipulating the data or even making experiments in such a way as to only obtaining specific data or throwing away certain data.