Respuesta :
Answer:
[tex]z=\frac{0.4 -0.35}{\sqrt{\frac{0.35(1-0.35)}{300}}}=1.82[/tex]
[tex]p_v =P(z>1.82)=0.034[/tex]
So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given [tex]\alpha=0.1[/tex] we have [tex]p_v<\alpha[/tex] so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis
And the best conclusion would be:
There is enough evidence to show that more than 35% of community college students own a smart phone (Pvalue = 0.034).
And for the second case the correct system of hypothesis is:
H0: p = 0.078; Ha: p > 0.078
Step-by-step explanation:
Data given and notation
n=300 represent the random sample taken
[tex]\hat p=\frac{120}{300}=0.4[/tex] estimated proportion of college students that have a smart phone
[tex]p_o=0.35[/tex] is the value that we want to test
[tex]\alpha=0.1[/tex] represent the significance level
Confidence=90% or 0.90
z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value (variable of interest)
Concepts and formulas to use
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the proportion is >0.35.:
Null hypothesis:[tex]p\leq 0.35[/tex]
Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p > 0.35[/tex]
When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:
[tex]z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}[/tex] (1)
The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion [tex]\hat p[/tex] is significantly different from a hypothesized value [tex]p_o[/tex].
Calculate the statistic
Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:
[tex]z=\frac{0.4 -0.35}{\sqrt{\frac{0.35(1-0.35)}{300}}}=1.82[/tex]
Statistical decision
It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.
The significance level provided [tex]\alpha=0.1[/tex]. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.
Since is a right tailed test the p value would be:
[tex]p_v =P(z>1.82)=0.034[/tex]
So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level given [tex]\alpha=0.1[/tex] we have [tex]p_v<\alpha[/tex] so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis
And the best conclusion would be:
There is enough evidence to show that more than 35% of community college students own a smart phone (Pvalue = 0.034).
And for the second case the correct system of hypothesis is:
H0: p = 0.078; Ha: p > 0.078
The conclusion for the hypothesis testing is that A. There is enough evidence to show that more than 35% of community college students own a smart phone (P = 0.034).
How to deduce the hypothesis?
From the information given, the z value is 1.82 and the appropriate p value is 0.034. Therefore, one should reject the null hypothesis.
This illustrates that there's enough evidence to show that more than 35% of community college students own a smart phone.
The appropriate null and alternative hypotheses for this research question for the case about smoking is H0: p = 0.078; Ha: p > 0.078.
Learn more about hypothesis on:
https://brainly.com/question/11555274